Menagerie

Monday, April 12, 2010

Can an article quoting “a prominent Cleveland Jewish businessman” be anti-Semitic? Yep.

The Curse of emails quoting material out-of-context.
4/12/2010
Can an article quoting “a prominent Cleveland Jewish businessman” be anti-Semitic? Yep.

An a whole bunch of other stuff when you dig deeper.
=======================================
Here is the suspect email I received a few days ago, and which I‘ve noticed is almost viral now.

In a message dated 4/10/2010 9:20:07 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
___@aol.com writes:
Life isn't tied with a bow, but it's still a gift.

Jewish Sam Miller on Catholics

Excerpts of an article written by non-Catholic Sam Miller - a prominent Cleveland Jewish businessman:

"Why would newspapers carry on a vendetta on one of the most important institutions that we have today in the United States , namely the Catholic Church?

Do you know - the Catholic Church educates 2.6 million students everyday at the cost to that Church of 10 billion dollars, and a savings on the other hand to the American taxpayer of 18 billion dollars. The graduates go on to graduate studies at the rate of 92%.

The Church has 230 colleges and universities in the U.S. with an enrollment of 700,000 students.

The Catholic Church has a non-profit hospital system of 637 hospitals, which account for hospital treatment of 1 out of every 5 people - not just Catholics - in the United States today

But the press is vindictive and trying to totally denigrate in every way the Catholic Church in this country. They have blamed the disease of pedophilia on the Catholic Church, which is as irresponsible as blaming adultery on the institution of marriage.

Let me give you some figures that Catholics should know and remember. For example, 12% of the 300 Protestant clergy surveyed admitted to sexual intercourse with a parishioner; 38% acknowledged other inappropriate sexual contact in a study by the United Methodist Church , 41.8% of clergy women reported unwanted sexual behavior; 17% of laywomen have been sexually harassed.


Meanwhile, 1.7% of the Catholic clergy has been found guilty of pedophilia. 10% of the Protestant ministers have been found guilty of pedophilia. This is not a Catholic Problem.

A study of American priests showed that most are happy in the priesthood and find it even better than they had expected, and that most, if given the choice, would choose to be priests again in face of all this obnoxious PR the church has been receiving.

The Catholic Church is bleeding from self-inflicted wounds. The agony that Catholics have felt and suffered is not necessarily the fault of the Church. You have been hurt by a small number of wayward priests that have probably been totally weeded out by now.

Walk with your shoulders high and you head higher. Be a proud member of the most important non-governmental agency in the United States . Then remember what Jeremiah said: 'Stand by the roads, and look and ask for the ancient paths, where the good way is and walk in it, and find rest for your souls'. Be proud to speak up for your faith with pride and reverence and learn what your Church does for all other religions.

Be proud that you're a Catholic."
==========================================================
==============================================================



The info seems bogus to me because it shows up via Google only on what appear to be right-wing Catholic web sites and blogs. The info seems unverifiable and is nothing at Snopes yet.

Google ( non-Catholic Sam Miller ) and you will get over 67,000 hits at the WEB TAB, but only 1 hit at the NEWS TAB. The “News” item is here
http://www.manilastandardtoday.com/insideOpinion.htm?f=2010/april/7/alvincapino.isx&d=2010/april/7

So this anti-NYT, (read anti-Jewish-Media), pro-right wing of the Catholic Church is a phenomenon only on the web; so that made me suspicious. Insidious, because it would have us believe it is not anti-Semitic because a “Jewish businessman” wrote it.

The right-wing of the Catholic Church, remember, has a history of holocaust denial and anti-Semitism:

“The tip of the Catholic traditionalist spear is not only pious, it is in parts also antisemitic.” http://cathcon.blogspot.com/2009/01/traditionalist-bishop-may-be-charged.html


==========================================
I did some research. That email contained only 344 words of the original 3410 words published in a Knights of Columbus local bulletin in Cleveland Ohio several years ago.

About 90% was left out: With good reason -- because the original contains nothing but sustained invective toward the messengers of the church abuse scandals and noting but unrelated praise for the church’s other activities including their schools. (I think I can speak with some authority on the subject because I am a product of 16 + years of Catholic schooling. For example, I know that his claims of graduation rates are incomplete and totally misleading. Of course Catholic schools can claim a high graduation rate; they can be choosy about who they let in. If they had to admit every child, no matter what problems they have, their graduation rate would be just as low.)


Sam Miller exhibits no scholarship, in my estimation: no attribution given for the quoted "studies," an unnamed "One of the biggest Catholic bashers in the United States" who supposedly agreed that the media was anti-Catholic; and irrelevant statistics going as far back as 1990.

Jewish or not, the businessman is not very good at disguising his contempt for the press, especially the NYT who he mentions at least 7 times as out-to-get the Catholic Church. At the time he wrote, about 2002, the scandal being reported was only in some USA Catholic dioceses.

The "Jewish businessman's" article got little coverage (except from right-wing fringe groups with the Church) because his argument is illogical, strident, specious, and easy to deconstruct.

But now, his jeremiad is also totally irrelevant because news organization around the world and even the National Catholic Reporter confirm longtime rampant abuse http://bit.ly/c4s0Ma. And those charges of abuse come from victims, not the media. The media is reporting a global story. Those upset by the disclosures prefer to "kill the messenger" rather than heed the message. National Catholic Reporter's senior correspondent John Allen:

"Now we have obvious confirmation that this is a global crisis." Other than Ireland, allegations of church-based sex abuse are increasing across Europe, including in Austria, Germany, the Netherlands, Spain and Switzerland. New abuse allegations have surfaced in Brazil, home of the world's largest Catholic population.
"It starts with the victims, then the media pick it up. Once victims are emboldened to come forward, it emboldens prosecutors and government officials to undertake investigations they may not have before out of fear of offending the church.”
In traditionally Catholic Ireland, the pews were already emptying before the sex abuse scandal broke. "But places like southern Germany and Austria and Poland are still very Catholic," said Gibson. The accumulating abuse allegations "will erode church participation there while accelerating the pace of secularization in places like France and England."


Here is the original (3410 word) Redemption Comes Through The Jews… Jewish Businessman, Sam Miller, Whaps Anti-Catholic Bias in News Media (Full Text)
http://fratres.wordpress.com/2008/06/24/redemption-comes-through-the-jews-jewish-businessman-sam-miller-whaps-anti-catholic-bias-in-news-media-full-text/


Sam Miller, prominent Cleveland businessman – Jewish, not Catholic – is fighting mad about & concentrated effort by the media to denigrate the Catholic Church in this country.
I’m going to say things here today that many Catholics should have said 18 months ago. Maybe it’s easier for me to say because I am not Catholic, but I have had enough, more than enough, disgustingly enough.
During my entire life I’ve never seen a greater vindictive, more scurrilous, biased campaign against the Catholic Church as I have seen in the last 18 months, and the strangest thing is that it is in a country like the United States where there is supposed to be mutual respect and freedom for all religions.
This has bothered me because I too am a minority in this country. You see, unfortunately and I say this very advisedly the Catholics have forgotten that in the early 1850’s when the Italians, the Poles, the Latvians, the Lithuanians, all of Catholic persuasion, came to this country looking for opportunity because of famine, (particularly the Irish) they were already looked upon with derision, suspicion and hatred. Consequently the jobs they were forced to take were the jobs that nobody else wanted bricklayers, ditch diggers, Jewish junkmen, street cleaners, etc.
This prejudice against your religion and mine has never left this country and don’t ever forget it, and (sic) never will. Your people were called Papists, Waps, Guineas, frogs, fish eaters, ad infinitum.
And then after the Civil War, around 1864, the fundamentalists, conservatives, Protestants and a few WASP’s began planting burning crosses throughout the country, particularly in the South. And today; as far as I’m concerned, very little has changed. These gentlemen now have a new style of clothing they’ve gone from bed sheets to gentlemen’s suits.
There is a concentrated effort by the media today to totally denigrate in every way the Catholic Church in this country. You don’t find it this bad overseas at all. They have now blamed the disease of pedophilia on the Catholic Church, which is as irresponsible as blaming adultery on the institution of marriage. You and me have been living in a false paradise. Wake up and recognize that many people don’t like Catholics. What are these people trying to accomplish?
From the Sojourner’s Magazine dated August, 2002, listen carefully to a quote, “While much of the recent media hype has focused on the Catholic Church’s pedophilia scandal, relatively little attention has been given to the high rate of sexual misconduct in the rest of American Christendom. This is truly a crisis that crosses the borders of all religions.”
Now let me give you some figures that you as Catholics should know and remember. For example, research by Richard Blackman at Fuller Theological Seminary shows that 12% of the 300 Protestant clergy surveyed admitted to sexual intercourse with a parishioner; 38% acknowledged other inappropriate sexual contact. In a 1990 study by the United Methodist Church, 41.8% of clergywomen reported unwanted sexual behavior by a colleague; 17% of laywomen said that their own pastors had sexually harassed them. Phillip Jenkins concludes in his book “Pedophiles and Priests” that while 1.7% of the Catholic clergy has been found guilty of pedophilia, 10% of Protestant ministers have been found guilty of pedophilia.
This is not a Catholic problem. This is a problem of pure prejudice. Why the papers, day after day, week after week, month after month, see fit to do nothing but come out with these scurrilous stories? When I spoke recently to one of the higher ups in the newspaper I said, “This is wrong”. He said, “Why, do you want us to shoot the messenger?” I said, “No, just change the message”. He said, “How?” I said, “I’ll tell you how”.
Obviously, this is not just a Catholic problem. And solutions must be broader and deeper than those carried out by Catholic cardinals. The whole church has a responsibility to offer decisive leadership in the area of sexual misconduct whether it is child abuse, sexual exploitation, or sexual harassment.
Recently, churches have shown unprecedented unity on issues of poverty and welfare reform. Now it is necessary to call for a broad based ecumenical council addressing the issue of sexual misconduct in the church not only the Catholic Church, all churches, including synagogues. Its goal would be transparency and openness in developing stringent, forward?looking guidelines, consistent with denominational distinctions, for preventing and addressing sexual misconduct within Christian churches and church?related institutions.
Such a council could include not only denominational representatives but also a majority presence from external organizations such as child protection agencies, law enforcement, psychiatric services, victims’ agencies, and legal and legislative representatives.
Crisis. “Crisis” in Chinese is one word. “Crisis” in Chinese means, on the one side, a real crisis problems etc., but the other side means great opportunity.
We have a great opportunity facing us. Crisis is often accompanied by an opportunity for extraordinary growth and leadership. We have that today. Even though you are the lowest ?? by far the lowest of any organized religion today when it comes to sexual harassment ?? American churches have a unique opening to develop and adopt a single set of policies, principles, practices, and common language on sexual misconduct in Christian institutions that is binding across denominations.
A system of cross denomination review boards could be established to help compliance and accountability. A centralized resource bank could be formed that provides church wide updates on new legal, financial, psychological and spiritual developments in the field. Guidelines, both moral and legal, could be established on how clergy, churches, and victims should best use civil and criminal actions in pursuit of justice and financial restitution for injury. A national database could be established with information on all applicants for ordination in any member Christian religion. Every diocese, conference, presbytery, and district could have a designated child protection representative whose job is to ensure that the policies and procedures are understood and implemented and that training is provided.
Any religious institution, or system, that leaves power unexamined or smothers sexuality with silence rather than promoting open conversation that can lead to moral and spiritual maturity becomes implicated in creating an unhealthy and potentially abusive environment. An ecumenical Christian council authentically dedicated to strong moral leadership in the area of clergy sexual misconduct might move the church beyond the extremes of policing our own or abandoning our own.
For Christians, the true scandal is not about priests. It’s about a manipulation of power to abuse the weak. When Jesus said, “Whoever receives the child, receives me”, he was rebuking his followers for putting stumbling blocks in front of the defenseless. Church is supposed to be a place where one can lay one’s defenses down; where one is welcomed, embraced, and blessed. This can only be authentically expressed in a culture that requires absolute respect for each individual’s freedom and self hood. Until all churches bow humbly under the requirement, the indictments by wounded women and children will stand.
Just what are these Kangaroo journalists trying to accomplish? Think about it. If you get the New York Times day’ ,after day; the Los Angeles Times day after day, our own paper day after day ………………….. looking at the record, some of these writers are apostates, Catholics or ex-Catholics who have been denied something they wanted from the Church and are on a mission of vengeance.
Why would newspapers carry on this vendetta on one of the most important institutions that we have today in the United States, namely the Catholic Church?
Do you know and maybe some of you don’t the Catholic Church educates 2.6 million students everyday, at cost to your Church of 10 billion dollars, and a savings on the other hand to the American taxpayer of 18 billion dollars. Needless to say, that Catholic education at this time stands head and shoulders above every other form of education that we have in this country. And the cost is approximately 30% less.
If you look at our own Cleveland school system, they can boast of an average graduation rate of 36%. Do you know what it costs you and me as far as the other 64% who didn’t make it?
Look at your own records. You (Catholic schools) graduate 89% of your students Your graduates in turn go on to graduate studies at the rate of 92%, and all at a cost to you. To the rest of the Americans it’s free, but it costs you Catholics at least 30% less to educate students compared to the costs that the public education system pays out for education that cannot compare.
Why? Why would these enemies of the Church try to destroy an institution that has 230 colleges and universities in the United States with an enrollment of 700,000 students?
Why would anyone want to destroy an institution like the Catholic Church which has a non profit hospital system of 637 hospitals which account for hospital treatment of 1 out of every 5 people not just Catholics in the . United States today?
Why would anyone want to destroy an institution like that? Why would anyone want to destroy an institution that clothes and feeds and houses the indigent 1 of 5 indigents in the United States, I’ve been to many of your shelters and no one asks them if you are a Catholic, a Protestant or a Jew; just “come, be fed, here’s a sweater for you and a place to sleep at night” at a cost to the Church of 2.3 billion dollars a year?
The Catholic Church today has 64 million members in the United States and is the largest non-governmental agency in the country. It has 20,000 churches in this country alone. Every year they raise approximately $10 billion to help support these agencies.
Why, after the “respected” publication, the New York Times, running their daily expose’ on the Church, finally came to the conclusion of their particular investigation, which was ongoing for a long time. And guess what: buried in the last paragraph, they came up with a mouse. In their article “Decades of Damage” the Times reported that 1.8% of American priests were found guilty of this crime whereas your own Cardinal Ratzinger in Rome reported 1.7% the figure I gave you earlier.
Then again they launched an attack on the Church and its celibate priests. However, the New York Times did not mention in their study of American priests that most are happy in the priesthood and find it even better than they had expected, and that most, if given the choice, would choose to be priests again in the face of all this obnoxious PR the church has been receiving.
Why wouldn’t the New York Times, the paper of record they call themselves, mention this? You had to read it in the Los Angeles Times. The New York Times refused to print it.
If you read only the New York Times, you would begin to believe that priests are cowards; craven; sexually frustrated; unhealthy criminals; that prey on the innocent. What a shame.
Sometimes freedom of the press should have some type of responsibility, too. So I say this to you: instead of walking around with a hangdog look ?? I talk to a lot of Catholics all the time, “how’s everything going?” ………… “Well, in the face of things I guess okay”. That’s the wrong answer! The wrong answer!
Also, I ran into a fellow who said they started a discussion at some social function on pedophilia and he said, “I excused myself and left the room.” I said, “why did you do that?” “Well, you know how it is”.
I believe that if Catholics had the figures that I enumerated here, you don’t have to be ashamed of anything. Not only are you as good as the rest, but you’re better, in every respect.
The Catholic Church helps millions of people every day of the week, every week of the month, and every month of the year. People who are not Catholics, and I sit on your Catholic Foundation and I can tell you, and what I am telling you is so. Priests have their problems, they have their failings just as you and I in this room do, but they do not deserve to be calumniated as they have been.
In small measure let’s give the media its due. If it had not come out with this story of abusive priests, (but they just as well could have mentioned reverends, pastors and rabbis and whatever), probably little or nothing would have been. done. But what bothers me the most is this has given an excuse to every Catholic hater and Catholic basher to come out loudly for the denigration of your Church.
If some CEO’s are crooks it does not follow that every CEO is crooked; and if some priests are sexually ill it does not follow that all are sick. And your Church teaches that you’ve got to take in the sick and a priest who is this way has to be taken in and cannot be thrown out the 21st story of a building. He’s got to be looked upon and given the same type of health that you would give anybody who has a broken leg or cancer or whatever.
The Church today, and when I say the Church keep in mind I am talking about the Catholic Church, is bleeding from self-inflicted wounds. The agony that Catholics have felt and suffered is not necessarily the fault of the Church. You have been hurt by an infinitesimally small number of wayward priests that, I feel, have probably been totally weeded out by now.
You see, the Catholic Church is much too viable to be put down by the New York Times, The Los Angeles Times, The Cleveland Plain Dealer take your choice, they can’t do it, they’re not going to do it and sooner or later they are going to give up. But you’ve got to make sure that you don’t give up first.
In 1799 a notice was placed in a French newspaper that a citizen Brachi had died in prison. Little did the people realize that this was Pope Pius VI who had occupied the Chair of Saint Peter for 25 years. He had been taken prisoner by Napoleon’s forces and died in prison as an indigent. At that time the thought was that this was the end of the Catholic Church, this was 200 and some odd years ago. And the reason was that there was no Pope to succeed him at that time.
But you fooled them then, and we’re going to fool them again.
I’ve been talking more or less about the United States of America as far as the importance of the Church. Let’s bring it home to Cuyahoga County and the seven surrounding counties.
In education, you save the county 420 million dollars per year. Wherever there’s a Church and most other churches have fled the inner city there’s a Catholic Church; and wherever there’s a Catholic Church there’s an absence of drug dealers. You talk to any bank that has real estate mortgages in the inner city, and they will tell you that the one thing that keeps up the value in that particular area is your Church. I’ve seen, for example, on Lorain near the Metro Catholic Schools there at the Church the nuns used to go out in the morning with brooms and sweep away the drug dealers from around the particular area.
On Health and Human Services, the homeless, adoption, drugs, adult care and so on, you saved the county 170 million dollars a year.
At the end of the day the difference that your local Catholic institutions make in the eight counties that comprise this diocese are several billion dollars per year.
Why don’t we hear about this? Why, because it’s good news. If some priest was caught with his hand in the collection plate it would be front page news. But the fact that you have thousands of students being education (sic) free, as far as the rest of the country is concerned, doesn’t make news. Why? Because it is not newsworthy, it’s not dirty.
I’m not here to deny freedom of the press, but I believe that with freedom comes responsibility, and with rights you have an obligation. You cannot have rights that are irresponsible.
Unfortunately, our society today is protected by all rights and ruled by some of their wickedness. Anybody who expects to reap the benefits of freedom must understand the total fatigue of supporting it. The most important element of political speech, as Aristotle taught, is the character of the speaker. In this respect, no matter what message a man brings in, it shouldn’t collide with his character.
The other day was shocked when I opened up America, a Catholic magazine, and my good friend Cardinal Keeler, who is a very dear friend of mine, was being fingerprinted by the Baltimore police not for a crime, but as part of the new law put in place that all members of the Church hierarchy must be fingerprinted.
Amos, of the Old Testament, accused the people of Samaria in words that seared and phrases that smote. They “cram their palaces,” he said, “with violence and extortion.” They had “sold the upright for silver and the poor for a pair of sandals” from Gucci, no doubt. But he also said that all this could be reversed, if only the people of Samaria would turn away from their own self absorption and toward those who, however silently, cry out for help. “Then,” promised Amos, “shall your justice flow like water and your compassion like a never failing stream” (Amos 5:24)
The worst feature of contemporary society is its tendency to leave each of us Locked up in himself or herself, connection less. To lessen this isolation we have developed all kinds of therapies spiritual, psychological, and physical front groups that meet and talk endlessly all day long in spas week spas, month spas, life spas. But none of these things, from primal screams to herbal wrap, seem to be doing the trick, any more than the huge houses and wine parties the.: the Samaritan did.
What we need to do is open our heart to the plight of others, even some of your priests who have been condemned. They’re human beings and they should be shown the same type of compassion we have shown anybody who is critically ill. We need to open our hearts to the plights of others, like our hearts were a dam, so that indeed our justice and compassion may flow to all.
What is essential is that each of us steps forward to hold out our hand to someone. There is no other way to walk with God.
One of the biggest Catholic bashers in the United States wrote “Only a minority, a tiny minority of priests, have abused the bodies of children.” He continues, “I am not advocating this course of action, but as much as I would like to see the Roman Catholic Church ruined. I hate opportunistically retrospective litigation even more.”
Now he’s talking about our tort monsters. “Lawyers who grow fat by digging up dirt on long?forgotten wrongs and hounding their aged perpetrators are no friends of mine.”
I’m still quoting this man, “All I’m doing” he said, “is calling attention to an anomaly. By all means, let’s kick a nasty institution when it is down, but there are better ways than litigation.” These words are from a Catholic hater.
I never thought in my life I would ever see these things.
Walk with your shoulders high and your head higher. Be a proud member of the most important non governmental agency today in the United States. Then remember what Jeremiah said: “Stand by the roads, and look, and ask for the ancient paths, where the good way is and walk in it, and find rest for your souls.” And be proud, speak up for your faith with pride and reverence and learn what your Church does for all other religions. Be proud that you’re a Catholic.


NOTE: Even though of the Jewish faith, Miller has been a staunch supporter of the Cleveland Diocese and Bishop Anthony Pilla. It was published in the May-June issue of the Buckeye Bulletin.

===================================================================


From http://chattahbox.com/technology/2009/05/08/facebook-says-holocaust-denial-groups-will-stay-put/


Ultraconservative Catholic Bishop, Richard Williamson and Holocaust denier, was recently re-admitted to the Catholic church by Pope Benedict XVI, in a controversial decision that generated lots of negative press and deservedly so.
Bishop Williamson apologized to the Pope for his remarks denying the Holocaust, but didn’t retract his previous statements when he said: “historical evidence is hugely against 6 million Jews having been deliberately gassed in gas chambers as a deliberate policy of Adolf Hitler.”

Sunday, April 11, 2010

On the 65th Anniversary of the Liberation of the Buchenwald Camp

Today, April 11,is the 65th anniversary of the liberation of the Buchenwald concentration camp. This clip is a portion of Edward R. Murrow's broadcast from Buchenwald a few day later on April 16, 1945 The photographs are mainly from Buchenwald, although there are some contemporary and modern photographs of Auschwitz as well. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d3SCSouI8WE

An additional 11 minutes from that Edward R. Murrow broadcast. Audio is good. There are some blank screen seconds juxtaposed with stills.

Those camps were the result of "National Socialism" which is absolutely not socialism. Fascism and Socialism ARE opposite ideologies. Something wrong in our classrooms and with our cable pundits when our citizens don't know the difference. Even the funny SNL spoof of the Palin Newwork last night made the mistake of reinforcing the mistake with that art lesson, putting a moustache on a cloud.

How and why they are opposites is a little complicated, but not *that* complicated. Easy to research on the web, but stay away from Beck and that idiotic blackboard schtick of his. Funny maybe to some, but he's playing with fire.
· 
There are hours of film made by the army which I first saw in 1985. Frontline used them here: http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/camp/view/

As the troops entered the German concentration camps, they made a systematic film record of what they saw. Work began in the summer of 1945 on the documentary, but the film was left unfinished.

FRONTLINE found it stored in a vault of London's Imperial War Museum and, in 1985, broadcast it for the first time using the title the Imperial War Museum gave it,
“Memory of the Camps." · 

And this from the BBC: Audio slideshow: Liberation of Belsen

Horrific scenes greeted British troops as they entered Bergen-Belsen concentration camp on 15 April 1945. They were accompanied by the BBC's Richard Dimbleby who recorded his first impressions for radio.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/in_depth/4445811.stm
==================================================
When I see pictures of Tea Parties, I can't help remember "Never Forget. Never again."

A Note about these past few posts and others to come

I am transferring some of my "note" from FaceBook to the blog which I have barely used. I'll try to include original dates as I continue to cut/paste

The Wages of RagesLoose-lip Conservatism....

FB 2/20/2010
The Wages of RagesLoose-lip Conservatism....

Excerpt from "The Wages of Rages," by GAIL COLLINS

Politicians often get into trouble when they’re trying to sound more furious than they feel. And Pawlenty told the conservatives they should try to be more like ... Tiger Woods’s wife.

“We should take a page out of her playbook and take a 9-iron and smash the window out of big government in this country,” he urged.

The overall strangeness of this thought aside, consider the timing. An angry man had just smashed his airplane into an I.R.S. office in Austin, Tex., killing one federal employee, injuring others and breaking quite a few windows. Does this seem like the very best time to be encouraging people to assault government property? Pawlenty’s defenders will undoubtedly say that he did not want his listeners to literally grab a golf club and hit something. But it is my experience that many Americans do not totally understand the concept of a metaphor.

Another star of the conservative conference, Scott Brown, was worse. When the new senator from Massachusetts was asked on Fox News about the I.R.S. office attack, he appeared to embrace the possibility that the pilot of the plane might have been one of his followers.
“And I don’t know if it’s related, but I can just sense, not only in my election but since being here in Washington, people are frustrated,” he said. “They want transparency.”
Let’s think this through. Andrew Joseph Stack III, the pilot, was a man with multiple hatreds, from Catholicism to unions, whose rage at the I.R.S. apparently began when the agency refused to allow him to declare his house a church for the purpose of avoiding taxes. And the end of the story is that he crashed a plane into a building, killing and injuring innocent people. Plus, he burned down his house. Where his wife and her daughter lived.

The Tea Party Movement: A Mass of Contradictions & Me The People...

FaceBook Note 2/20/2010

What the Tea Party Movement Wants: A Mass of Contradictions & Me The People


What the Tea Party Movement Wants
To the Editor:
The Tea Party movement want a strong military, but don’t want to finance it; they don’t like social programs like Medicare, but readily accept their Medicare benefits; they don’t like the federal bailout of our financial markets, but would be angry if the government did nothing and their investments and retirements went down the drain; they want strong border controls, but again don’t want to pay for it.They are a mass of contradictions. John Georgiton, Columbus, Ohio, Feb., 16, 2010

•========================= =============
To the Editor:
the Tea Party movement’s approach of “small government” is what got us into this financial mess in the first place, and I shudder to think what might happen if we had no government regulation of big business and finance.
Often saying one is against big government is really an indirect way of saying one is in the pocket of big business and finance. Randall Roark Miami, Feb. 16, 2010

========================== =================

To the Editor:
The Tea Party leaders want “strict adherence to the Constitution.” But since the Tea Party members distrust government, do they really understand and approve of what the Constitution actually states: Congress shall have power to provide for the “general welfare of the United States”? And further, “to make all laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into execution the foregoing powers” (Article 1, Section 8)?
The Tea Party seems confused — lauding the Constitution, which gives broad power to Congress, on the one hand, and fearing a properly activist government as a threat on the other hand. The Tea Party leaders and followers may wish to emphasize personal freedom, but they have the “socialism” (government providing for its people) of the Constitution to contend with. Robbins Winslow Naples, Fla., Feb. 16, 2010

•========================= =====================
To the Editor:
They wear T-shirts with “We the People” slogans and pictures of the American flag and bald eagle, but they do not represent me. In fact, I don’t know who the so-called Tea Party activists stand for besides themselves. I have observed that many of them are people who have gotten where they are through the good schools and other government infrastructure their parents and grandparents built for them. Perhaps they mean “Me the People.”
Many are senior citizens who think nothing of taking their Winnebagos to our national parks and enjoying some of the crown jewels of this nation, but then squawking about helping build a better society for the next generations. Shame on them!
I am a military veteran who has spent more than 35 years in public service. I have no problem paying more for the society that I live in, and no problem helping pay for a bigger and better society for our grandkids. This is no longer a country of prairie schooners. Richard Dickinson Glendale, Calif., Feb. 16, 2010

•=================================================== To the Editor:
The marriage of the Tea Party movement with the militia groups’ call to arms is scary.
Anger is energizing. The all-consuming rumor mill, much of which still perpetuates outrageously paranoid content not based in reality, generates comradeship and self-righteous indignation. Sadly, it will likely take some acts of horrific violence to bring these ordinary citizens back to their senses. Anne-Marie Hislop Chicago, Feb. 16, 2010

To the Editor:
Is it too much to hope for? That all the Tea Party people, in anger, will burn their Medicare and Social Security cards, to rid themselves of government intervention, and that the resulting influx in funds will go to finance such benefits for all the rest of us?
Ellen Stein
Closter, N.J.,

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/02/18/opinion/l18tea.html?scp=1&sq=john%20georgiton&st=cse#

A Republican I Respect Tonight - Like the GOP I Remember

A Republican I respect tonight.

FaceBook note February 18, 2010

Video and complete transcript at link
http://www.pbs.org/newshour/bb/business/jan-june10/deficit_02-18.html

Excerpts prompting me to admire Senator Simpson in this interview.

JUDY WOODRUFF: I sat down with the two chairs of the president's new commission in the Eisenhower Executive Office Building this afternoon. Erskine Bowles, Senator Alan Simpson, it's good to see both of you. Senator Simpson, you told a Montana newspaper this is like being on a suicide mission. Did you really mean that?

ALAN SIMPSON: Well, I hate -- it's a dual suicide. Let me tell you, in all the humor of it, this is dead serious stuff. you know, what we need to do is just push the ball forward, and do it for our grandchildren. And that's what we're here for. It sounds corny, I know, but that's the way it is.

JUDY WOODRUFF: Well, some people, mainly Republicans right now, are arguing, what's really needed are tax cuts, that, even if it raises the deficit in the short term, that this would get government out of the way of business, business could grow, and the deficit will take care of itself.

ALAN SIMPSON: Well, I'm not smoking that same pipe. I just -- everything is on the table. But, if we're just going to use flash words like cutting children's benefits or cutting veterans or raising taxes, it will be a tougher struggle. Everything is out there. We -- I know how to -- how people use emotion, fear, guilt, and racism. I have been through that old stuff with immigration. If those -- I say to them, I don't use those. I use facts. And we're going to do a lot of facts.

JUDY WOODRUFF: I mean, are those things that you're going to be seriously considering?

ERSKINE BOWLES: . It can't be a Republican, it can't be a Democrat thing. And he has insisted that everything be on the table. And that's everything.

JUDY WOODRUFF: And that includes tax increases for the middle class?

ALAN SIMPSON: And, again, it's just a flash word. The last time they did the Social Security correction, they tweaked the system. I think it was one-tenth-of-1-percent of the payroll tax. Man, oh, man, there's a big one. But the rest of it is B.S. And if the people are really ingesting B.S. all day long, their grandchildren will be picking grit with the chickens.

JUDY WOODRUFF: Tom Price, a Republican, who said, the fact that the president is already putting I think a couple of more Democrats on this 18-member commission than he is Republicans means, he said, the odds are high that your recommendations are going to be heavy on tax increases and light on spending recommendations.

ALAN SIMPSON: See, this guy is missing the boat. This is sound bite business. And that's great. That gets you reelected. But it won't help the country.

JUDY WOODRUFF: Senator Simpson, there is, at the same time, an atmosphere in this city, people call it a hyper-partisanship, of just a bitter division between the two parties.
And, right now, you have got, quite candidly, leaders in the Republican Party, Majority Leader Boehner, Senator McConnell, who initially resisted the idea of even appointing anybody to this commission.

ALAN SIMPSON: But now they're going to do it. And I visited with both John and Mitch and told them what I was going to do. And I said, I hope you can help. I hope you will appoint some good people. And they said, we will talk. And I understand that they're making -- they're going to make selections. That's all we can ask.

JUDY WOODRUFF: Speaking of this atmosphere of partisanship, how much harder does it make your work? I mean, how do you compare it to the time you were in Washington with President Clinton?

ALAN SIMPSON: I think it's worse than I have ever seen, but that doesn't mean that we should just hang up the phone and let this engine come down the track with no brakes on. And that's what's happening. This is an engine with no brakes.

JUDY WOODRUFF: You're going to make some recommendations, but nobody in Congress is required to enact this. So, how do you translate what you do into...

ALAN SIMPSON: But we may be -- we will be called naive. I will be called a Republican toady. Rush babe will be after me day and night. I mean, it's going to be a thrilling experience. But I have been there before. But this is bigger than me or Erskine or you. This is about your children. This is about the future of America. This country is going to go to the bowwows unless we deal with the entitlements and Social Security and Medicare. If -- if -- I think people will trust us. I hope that's the case. At least, so far, so good. They will say, I don't like Simpson, but the nut is half-right sometimes.
And -- and, so, I have no illusions about this. My dear wife, Ann, who you know, she said, Al, what are you doing? And I said, well, it's for the cause. It's for our grandkids.
She said, the old carry on. Here's a sandwich, and head out the door, and a brown-bag lunch.

JUDY WOODRUFF: So, do -- you do expect to take flak?

ERSKINE BOWLES: You bet.

ALAN SIMPSON: We -- and you know how we will beat them? With humor. Humor is the universal solvent against the abrasive elements of life. And when they begin to hammer on us -- the people who hammer on you are humorless. They don't know what a smile is or laughter. They have got -- they're hundred-percenters. They have got B.O. and heartburn and gas. And they just come at you. And, so, those people are easy to handle. They get irritated. They call us silly people. See, that's how that works.

JUDY WOODRUFF: We will be watching both of you.

Still I RiseStill I Rise -- A Poem by Maya Angelou

Still I RiseStill I Rise -- a poem by Maya Angelou

You may write me down in history
With your bitter, twisted lies,
You may trod me in the very dirt
But still, like dust, I'll rise.

Does my sassiness upset you?
Why are you beset with gloom?
'Cause I walk like I've got oil wells
Pumping in my living room.

Just like moons and like suns,
With the certainty of tides,
Just like hopes springing high,
Still I'll rise.

Did you want to see me broken?
Bowed head and lowered eyes?
Shoulders falling down like teardrops,
Weakened by my soulful cries.

Does my haughtiness offend you?
Don't you take it awful hard
'Cause I laugh like I got gold mines
Diggin' in my own back yard.

You may shoot me with your words,
You may cut me with your eyes,
You may kill me with your hatefulness,
But still, like air, I'll rise.

Does my sexiness upset you?
Does it come as a surprise
That I dance like I've got diamonds
At the meeting of my thighs?

Out of the huts of history's shame
I rise
Up from a past that's rooted in pain
I rise
I'm a black ocean, leaping and wide,
Welling and swelling I bear in the tide.

Leaving behind nights of terror and fear
I rise
Into a daybreak that's wondrously clear
I rise
Bringing the gifts my ancestors gave,
I am the dream and the hope of the slave.
I rise
I rise
I rise.

FaceBook note 2/14/2010

ACORN: A Non-Issue. A Red Herring.

Raising ACORN as an issue is a red herring, a distraction from the issue of the corrupting influence of money on our political system.

FaceBook note Sunday, February 14, 2010 at 7:50am

See http://www.scribd.com/doc/24424725/Congressional-Research-Service-Report-On-Acorn

"Federal agencies, mainly the Departments of Justice and Housing and Urban Development, have awarded money to the group 48 times since 2005. But, in none of those instances did Acorn violate the terms of their funding, the report said.... See More

Since the 2008 elections, the group, which works primarily to expand voter registration and affordable housing, has become a key Republican target. A series of scandals brought to light by conservative activists led to multiple Congressional hearings and repeated attempts to deny it taxpayer funding.

Acorn has been the subject of scores of investigations—a total of 46 inquiries by federal, state, and local agencies, including the FBI and the Treasury Department, and five by Congress as of October 2009, according to the report.

The report found no evidence that voters attempting to cast ballots at the polls had been improperly registered by Acorn, a chief Republican accusation." http://nyti.ms/5TFfdI

Why the 60's were Good

Why the 60's were Good

Saturday, January 23, 2010
After reading an excerpt from his 1965 “Alabamy, With Hate,”
Harlan Ellison on why “The Sixties Were Good”:

"I know the 60s were good, and I’ll tell you why I know they were good.

"In the 60s and on into the 70s, you would go to a college and there was an electrical charge. There was a sense that people were weighing and evaluating-- that they were taking all the parts of society that we had lived with for over two hundred years, and they were sort of jostling them and shaking them up and seeing which ones would fall through the cultural sieve and which ones had enough weight and substance to stay.

"I’m not saying that there were not foolishness, love beads and people streaking ….

"When an entire decade--and we’re talking about a decade that runs from about 61-62 to about 75, so its more than 10 years-- but that era, when one talks about it in terms of its dumbest parts rather than its most noble parts, you know you are dealing with a prejudiced, with a closed and with a mean-spirited mind.

"And that’s what they invariably do. They don’t talk about any of the things they ought to: the emerging African nations, the civil rights movements, the feminist movement. They see the worst parts of all of these things because they fear change.

"These are the reactionary elements that have been in our society since the very beginning

"We have been always a fiercely anti-intellectual nation, fiercely anti-intellectual: 'If you are so smart why arent you wealthy?' Or 'You cant fight city hall.' Or 'Who the hell do you think you are?' Or 'I’m entitled to my own opinion!'

No, schmuck! You are not entitled to your opinion. You’re entitled to your informed opinion. Without information, it’s just babble, hot air, and farts to wind. So the 60s was a period in which a lot of things were questioned."

================================================

The excerpt he had been reading from -- "Alabamy, With Hate” 1965

"The 25th of March. Fifty thousand people walking the red-mud roads of Alabama, singing; the outsiders, come to tell a crazed bigot that the Civil War was long dead, that a house divided was soon to topple, that the state of evil that Alabama had become would no longer be tolerated in a United States.

"The Freedom March on Montgomery Alabama: A Biased Report. And if you weren’t marching with us, go screw yourself."

From the documentary, “Dreams with Sharp Teeth”

http://www.documentaryfilms.net/index.php/dreams-with-sharp-teeth

Available at Amazon and Netflix

Jon Stewart on CNN: A Profile in Courage

Jon Stewart on CNN: A Profile in CourageJon

Stewart Crossfire Transcript, Excerpts:

STEWART: See, the thing is, we need your help. Right now, you're helping the politicians and the corporations. And we're left out there to mow our lawns.

No, no, no, you're not too rough on them. You're part of their strategies. You are partisan, what do you call it, hacks.

So what I would suggest is, when you talk about you're holding politicians' feet to fire, I think that's disingenuous. I think you're...

I'm here to confront you, because we need help from the media and they're hurting us.
To do a debate would be great. But that's like saying pro wrestling is a show about athletic competition.

You're doing theater, when you should be doing debate, which would be great.

What you do is not honest. What you do is partisan hackery.

You have a responsibility to the public discourse, and you fail miserably.
When you have people on for just knee-jerk, reactionary talk...

I watch your show every day. And it kills me. It's so -- oh, it's so painful to watch.

We need what you do. This is such a great opportunity you have here to a actually get politicians off of their marketing and strategy.

Where's your moral outrage on this? After the debates, where do you guys head to right afterwards? You go to spin alley, the place called spin alley. Now, don't you think that, for people watching at home, that's kind of a drag, that you're literally walking to a place called deception lane? …You know what's interesting, though? You're as big a dick on your show as you are on any show.

I just think that nobody holds their feet to the fire to do it. So they don't have to. They get to come on shows that don't...

==============================

"What you do is not honest. What you do is partisan hackery. You have a responsibility to the public discourse, and you fail miserably….It's not so much that it's bad, as it's hurting America ... Stop, stop, stop, stop hurting America." --Jon Stewart, to "Crossfire" hosts Tucker Carlson and Paul Begala

[As Tucker tries to bait Stewart with rhetorical tricks, leading questions and statements....]

"No. No. I'm not going to be your monkey." --Jon Stewart, to Tucker Carlson

http://politicalhumor.about.com/library/bljonstewartcrossfire.htm#

[To its credit, CNN cancelled Crossfire not long after his interview. But its clones remain all over cable news and AM radio.]


reposted from FaceBook notes

David Brooks on Obama's Promises

David Brooks
Thursday, January 19, 2010

David Brooks: "In many ways, Barack Obama has lived up to his promise. He has created a thoughtful, pragmatic administration marked by a culture of honest and vigorous debate. When Obama makes a decision, you can be sure that he has heard and accounted for every opposing argument. If he senses an important viewpoint is not represented at a meeting, he will stop the proceedings and demand that it gets included.

"If the evidence leads him in directions he finds uncomfortable, he will still follow the evidence. He is beholden to no ideological camp, and there is no group in his political base that he has not angered at some point in his first year."

[The rest of this regarding "a voracious pragmatism"---I'm not convinced.]

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/01/19/opinion/19brooks.html

Copied from FaceBook note of 1/21/2010

Lincoln's Republican Party

Letter to the Coaster Editor, Dec. 10 2009


Not mine but, it's the 2nd one worth saving.
==========================================
Repeating History

Editor, Coaster:

We've been through this before in these very pages of The Coaster. Like the characters in an old episode of the Twilight Zone, we seem to be forced to relive what has already happened whether we like it or not. We're forever cursed to have to revisit the same old refuted takes on history by people who pretend to know all about it. Michael Fornio has implied that Abraham Lincoln was a Republican by today's standards and that Republicans were responsible for the Civil Rights Act being passed. But nothing could be farther from the truth.

While Lincoln was indeed a Republican, the Republican party of Lincoln's day was something that today's Republicans wouldn't recognize. Lincoln wouldn't be accepted by today's Republicans for the simple reason that he was a liberal by today's standards. Today we hear incessantly from the Republicans about states' rights while Lincoln used the full force of the federal government to coerce states to comply with a federal standard regarding slavery. The Southern states didn't agree, so we fought a war over it. Can you imagine the uproar from the Right if that happened today? They'd be calling the President a "liberal" and a "socialist" at the top of their lungs! The 1964 Civil Rights Act was passed by Northern liberals over the objections of Southern conservatives. Members of both parties voted on both sides of the issue, but it was most definitely opposed by conservatives, and today's Republican party is completely conservative except for a few moderates that the party won't support. And when Lyndon Johnson signed the Civil Rights Act into law, he said that by doing so he had lost the South for the Democrats for a generation. That's why the base of today's Republican party is in the South.

So it's clear that conservative politics has been on the wrong side of the issue yet today's ultra-conservative Republican spin doctors think they can trick its unsuspecting rank-an-file into promoting a revisionist history that portrays them as Good Guys even as they continue to support the politics of the Old South.

RS, Ocean Grove

With permission